The Spread of Social Inclusion in the Maritime Industry: A Social Study

Authors

  • Lucie Sislian Cégep Marie-Victorin, Montréal, Québec, Canada Author
  • Anicia Jaegler Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51325/ejbti.v2i1.120

Keywords:

Sustainability, Social Inclusion, Diversity, Port, Maritime, Structural Equation Modeling, ‎Partial Least Squares.

Abstract

This paper presents a social study on the maritime port of Montreal investigating the spread of social inclusion in the maritime industry. We used both qualitative and quantitative methods, including structural equation modeling to answer the research questions. Our findings show that the spread of social inclusion was significant in the port in terms of workplace diversity and inclusion, the workplace environment, and the port’s responsibility toward society. These findings highlight specific factors that are currently being overlooked and thus require greater industry collaboration. The proposed framework also serves as a tool for a single maritime port to self-assess its current stage of sustainable development, with implications for future social-inclusion implementation strategies.

Author Biographies

  • Lucie Sislian, Cégep Marie-Victorin, Montréal, Québec, Canada

    Cégep Marie-Victorin, Montréal, Québec, Canada

  • Anicia Jaegler

    Kedge Business School, Paris, France

References

Alaghbari, L. M. A., Othman, A. H. A., & Noor, A. B. M. (2021). Challenges and ‎difficulties facing Islamic financial inclusion in women's economic ‎empowerment in Yemen: Qualitative approach. International Journal of ‎Business Ethics and Governance, 4(3), 91–114. ‎https://doi.org/10.51325/ijbeg.v4i3.80‎

Alamoush, A. S., Ballini, F., & Ölçer, A. I. (2021). Revisiting port sustainability ‎as a foundation for the implementation of the United Nations ‎Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs). Journal of Shipping and ‎Trade, 6(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-021-00101-6‎

Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Evaluating sustainability: a need for ‎standards. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 2(1), 19-35. ‎https://doi.org/10.22164/isea.v2i1.23‎

Benamara, H., Hoffmann, J., & Youssef, F. (2019). Maritime transport: The ‎sustainability imperative. In Sustainable Shipping (pp. 1–31). Springer, ‎Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04330-8_1‎

Evangelista, P. (2014). Environmental sustainability practices in the transport ‎and logistics service industry: An exploratory case study investigation. ‎Research in Transportation Business & Management, 12, 63–72. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.10.002‎

Froholdt, L. L. (Ed.). (2018). Corporate social responsibility in the maritime ‎industry (Vol. 5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69143-5_2‎

Gupta, I., Mishra, N., & Tandon, D. (2020). Triple bottom line: Evidence from ‎aviation sector. International Journal of Business Ethics and Governance, ‎‎3(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.51325/ijbeg.v3i1.32‎

Hunt, V., Prince, S., Dixon-Fyle, S., & Yee, L. (2018). Delivering through ‎diversity. McKinsey & Company.‎

International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2021). A concept of a sustainable ‎maritime transportation system, sustainable development: IMO’s ‎contribution beyond RIO+20.‎

Kunnaala, V. H., Lappalainen, J., & Storgärd, J. (2013). Corporate social ‎responsibility in the Baltic Sea maritime sector. In IMISS2013—‎Proceedings of the international scientific meeting for corporate social ‎responsibility (CSR) in shipping, 2nd international maritime incident and ‎near-miss reporting conference (pp. 11–12). Kotka, Finland.‎

Kurucz, E., Colbert, B., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The business case for corporate ‎social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & ‎D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility ‎‎(pp. 83-112). Oxford University Press. ‎https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0004‎

Lund-Thomsen, P., Poulsen, R. T., & Ackrill, R. (2016). Corporate social ‎responsibility in the international shipping industry: State-of-the-art, ‎current challenges, and future directions. The Journal of Sustainable ‎Mobility, 3(2), 3–13. ‎https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.2350.2016.de.00002‎

McHugh, M. L. (2013). The chi-square test of independence. Biochemia ‎Medica, 23(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.11613/issn.1846-7482‎

Moir, L. (2021). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? ‎Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, ‎‎1(2), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005486‎

Ntona, M., & Morgera, E. (2018). Connecting SDG 14 with the other ‎Sustainable Development Goals through marine spatial planning. Marine ‎Policy, 93, 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.06.020‎

Pedersen, C. S. (2018). The UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) are a ‎great gift to business! Procedia CIRP, 69, 21–24. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.01.003‎

Port of Montreal. (2022). Statistiques. https://www.port-montreal.com/fr/le-‎port-de-montreal/le-port/en-bref/statistiques

Poulovassilis, A., & Meidanis, S. (2013). Sustainability of shipping—Addressing ‎corporate social responsibility through management systems. Saatavilla. ‎http://www.commonlawgic.org/sustainabilityof-shipping.html

Progoulaki, M., & Roe, M. (2011). Dealing with multicultural human resources ‎in a socially responsible manner: A focus on the maritime industry. ‎WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 10(1), 7–23. ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-011-0003-0‎

Qingmei, L., & Hong, Z. (2021). The effect of maritime cluster on port ‎production efficiency. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(1), 61–74. ‎https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1754479‎

Roe, M. (2013). Maritime governance and corporate social responsibility in ‎shipping: Process rather than form. In IMISS2013—Proceedings of the ‎international scientific meeting for corporate social responsibility (CSR) ‎in shipping, 2nd international maritime incident and near-miss reporting ‎conference (pp. 11–12). Kotka, Finland.‎

Saunders, F. P., Gilek, M., & Tafon, R. (2019). Adding people to the sea: ‎Conceptualizing social sustainability in maritime spatial planning. In ‎Maritime spatial planning (pp. 175–199). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98696-8_8‎

Sciberras, L., & Silva, J. R. (2018). The UN’s 2030 agenda for sustainable ‎development and the maritime transport domain: The role and ‎challenges of IMO and its stakeholders through a grounded theory ‎perspective. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 17(3), 435–459. ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0147-2‎

Sislian, L., Jaegler, A., & Cariou, P. (2016). A literature review on port ‎sustainability and ocean’s carrier network problem. Research in ‎Transportation Business & Management, 19, 19–26. ‎https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.03.005‎

Soiferman, L. K. (2010). Compare and contrast inductive and deductive ‎research approaches. Online Submission.‎

Tenenhaus, M., Silvano, A., & Esposito, V. (2004). A global goodness-of-fit ‎index for PLS structural equation modeling. In Proceedings of the XLII ‎SIS scientific meeting (pp. 739–742).‎

Timane, R. (2012). Business advantages of corporate social responsibility: ‎Cases from India. SSRN Electronic Journal. ‎https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2180500‎

Virto, L. R. (2018). A preliminary assessment of the indicators for Sustainable ‎Development Goal (SDG) 14 “Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, ‎seas and marine resources for sustainable development.” Marine Policy, ‎‎98, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.08.036

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31

How to Cite

Sislian, L., & Jaegler, A. (2023). The Spread of Social Inclusion in the Maritime Industry: A Social Study. EuroMid Journal of Business and Tech-Innovation (EJBTI), 2(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.51325/ejbti.v2i1.120

Similar Articles

1-10 of 52

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.